Bar Chart

Band 4+: The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied 'very good' about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied 'very good' about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a bar graph comparing the percentage of patients who replied "very good" about their hospital experience by three different wards: Holly, Maple, and Oak, across four categories. For 'Hospital staff', Holly Ward is at 60%, Maple Ward at 50%, and Oak Ward at 70%. 'Waiting time' shows Holly at around 40%, Maple at 30%, and Oak at 30%. 'Quality of treatment' has Holly at 90%, Maple at 80%, and Oak at near 100%. Lastly, 'Quality of aftercare' depicts Holly at 80%, Maple at 70%, and Oak at 90%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The data displays the findings of a survey conducted among patients who were accommodated in three different wards of a hospital. Overall, it is noticeable that the best result was seen in the Helly Ward in the quality of treatment. Also, Maple ward was not as good as Holly ward in terms of hospital staff and spending time.

A large number of people , around 87% who, liked the hospital staff in Helly ward. Oak ward, which was the second largest of hospital employees, while a small decline was seen in Maple room for hospital clients. Moreover, close to75% of visitors who replied “very good” about their waiting time, by Holly zone, when in the Maple and Oak wards were lower.

Starting with their quality of treatment for clients, Holly ward had the highest share of “very good” answers between Maple and Oak wards. After that, there was a slightly higher percentage (90%) of people who described the standard of treatment as “very good” by the Oak department. Finally, by Maple area, 50% of clients were less happy with the quality of follow-up care.

Word Count: 184

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

hospital: 5

maple: 5

wards: 3

quality: 3

treatment: 3

holly: 3

clients: 3

"very: 3

good": 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report attempts to address the task but struggles significantly with accuracy and clarity. There is a frequent misuse of terminology; for example, referring to hospital wards as 'rooms', 'zones', 'departments', or 'areas', and describing patients as 'hospital employees' or 'visitors'. This creates confusion regarding the subject matter. Additionally, many of the data points provided do not align with the visual description (e.g., stating 87% for staff in Holly ward or 75% for waiting time), which undermines the reliability of the report. To improve, focus on using consistent terminology related to the prompt and ensure that the numbers reported accurately reflect the data provided in the chart.

Coherence & Cohesion

The organization of ideas is somewhat logical, but the progression is frequently interrupted by confusing sentence structures. While you attempt to use cohesive devices (e.g., 'Overall', 'Moreover', 'Finally'), they often fail to connect the ideas smoothly because the underlying sentences are grammatically fractured. To improve, focus on ensuring that each sentence has a clear subject and predicate so that the reader can follow your comparisons without having to re-read segments.

Lexical Resource

There is an attempt to vary vocabulary (e.g., 'accommodated', 'findings', 'decline'), but many terms are used incorrectly or inappropriately for the context. Using terms like 'Maple room', 'Holly zone', 'Oak department', and 'Maple area' to refer to hospital wards is unnatural and imprecise. Additionally, referring to patients as 'hospital clients', 'visitors', or 'hospital employees' is inaccurate. Stick to the terminology provided in the prompt (e.g., 'patients' and 'wards') to maintain accuracy and professional tone.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains significant grammatical errors that impede communication. There are several incomplete sentences (fragments), such as 'Oak ward, which was the second largest of hospital employees...', which lack a main verb. There are also issues with relative clauses and prepositional usage. I recommend practicing sentence structure, specifically focusing on how to form complex sentences using subordinating conjunctions without losing the main clause. Ensure every sentence contains a clear subject and a finite verb.

Answers On The Same Topic:

See All

The bar chart shows the percentage of students in Country X who participated in football, basketball, tennis, and swimming in 2010 and 2020.

The bar chart illuatrates the percentage of students in X country who participated in different sports from 2010 – 2020. Obseved that football was tie most greated proportion in 2010 and 2020 in the other hands tennis shows the lowest percentage over that years. Furthermore, students who participate in basketball were 40% compare to swimming […]

Band 4+

The chart below shows the main reasons for deforestation in three different regions of the world during two separate decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of forest loss for five reasons (cattle ranching, commercial agriculture, logging, subsistence farming and other) in three different regions (South America, Southeast Asia and Central Africa.) Cattle ranching is considered a huge reason for forest loss in South America and the highest bar in the chart, Southeast Asia’s primary […]

Band 4+

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The number of vehicles per 1000 in 5 countries and the overall. Overall, Country five had the highest number of cars throughout the period, while Country 1 had the lowest number of cars all three years. Also, all countries’ figures fluctuated apart from Country 4 because it levelled off same level. Country five the had […]

Band 4+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

The bar chart shows the percentage of students in Country X who participated in football, basketball, tennis, and swimming in 2010 and 2020.

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The chart below shows the main reasons for deforestation in three different regions of the world during two separate decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The charts below show the amount of money spent on advertising in the UK and Australia across five different media types in 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium