🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 7+: The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image is a line graph depicting the proportion of energy produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010; in 1995 Germany produced around 55%, Denmark approximately 40%, France nearly 25%, and Sweden just above 5%; in 2010, Germany and Denmark produced around 20%, France approximately 5%, and Sweden less than 5%; all countries show a downward trend with varying degrees of fluctuation; Germany had a notable increase around 2007 before decreasing again, Denmark had a sharp drop between 2001 and 2004 then remained steady, France had a steadier decline, and Sweden remained mostly stable with a slight decrease.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph below gives information on the proportions of energy generated from coal across four distinct European countries, spanning from 1995 to 2010.

Overall, the majority of countries experienced a consistent downward trend, with Germany showing the most significant changes. Sweden and France demonstrated similar trajectories over the 15-year period.

For Sweden and France, both proportions fell slightly. Sweden started at approximately 35% and after remaining stagnant during the period from 1998 to 2001, it dipped to about 28% in 2015. France’s percentage commenced with 30% and ended up at nearly 24% by the end of the timeframe.

Regarding Germany and Denmark, both figures exhibited a clear decrease over the period. Denmark, which started at the highest percentage of 60%, fell steadily to 25% in 2004, remaining stable until 2007, and finally dropped to the lowest 10%. Germany dipped from its starting 55% to a mere 5% in 2007, then rising sharply to about 18% by 2015.

Word Count: 158

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of energy generated by coal in four European countries in period between 1995 and 2010. Overall, the proportion of energy produced from coal in each country witnessed a downward trend. While Denmark and Germany experienced a dramatic decrease, France and Sweden slightly fell. In 1995, Germany had the highest […]

The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of energy generated from coal in Sweden, France, Denmark and Germany from 1995 to 2010. Overall, the proportion of energy produced from coal declined in all four countries over the period. Denmark and Germany experienced the most dramatic decreases, whereas Sweden and France stayed relatively constant and remained at […]

The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates how much energy was produced from coal in Sweden, France, Denmark, and Germany between 1995 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that all four countries experienced a downward trend. Denmark and Germany were the most successful producers of energy but became the least. There was a dramatic fall in the […]

The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of energy generated from coal in four European nations – Sweden, France, Denmark, and Germany – over a fifteen-year period from 1995 to 2010. Overall, all four countries experienced a decline in their reliance on coal for energy production during this period. Denmark and Germany demonstrated the most dramatic […]

See All

Other Topics:

The line graph shows the percentage of people who used three different types of transport (car, bus, and bicycle) to travel to work in a city between 2000 and 2020.

The presented bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who used different types of transport for commuting in a city in 2000 and 2020. Looking at the overall trends, it is evident that cars were the most commonly used means of transportation in 2020, whereas bicycles were the least used in 2000. Looking more closely […]

The graph below shows the sepending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countires between 1975 and 2000.

The line graph compares the amount of money spent on research in four different nations, namely Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and the UK, over the period from 1975 to 2000. The figures are given in dollars. Overall, it can be seen that Switzerland remained the highest-spending country on research and showed an upward trend, while Denmark […]

The line graph below shows the average weekly consumption of four types of drinks in a European country between 1980 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the average weekly consumption of four different types of drinks namely,milk,coffee,tea,and juice in a European county from 1980 to 2020. Overall,all off thes foure different types of drinks experienced fluctuation throughout the period,where the consumption of tea and juice an upward trend.In contrast,the milk and coffee was dawnward trend in the […]

The graph below shows the consumption of fish in different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

The line graph illustrates the consumption of 4 types of meat per person in a European country from 1979 to 2004. Overall, chicken consumption rose considerably and became the most popular type of meat by the end of the period. In contrast, beef and lamb consumption declined substantially, while fish remained relatively stable and was […]

Task 1: The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The line graph provides information on the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers. Overall, pizza and hamburgers consumption increased significantly over the given period, while the figure for fish and chips showed a clear downward trend. Focusing on the consumption of pizza and hamburgers, although pizza was consumed under 20 times in 1975, the […]

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.

The line graph illustrates how the population percentage changed in Philippines, Malaysia,Thailand and Indonesia from 1970 to 2040 Overall,a upward trend was observed in most categories, particularly in Malaysia and Indonesia,while the opposite was the case for Philippines and Thailand relatively stable.It is also important to note that Malaysia recorded the highest population and reach […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.