🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 8+: "The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004."

Image for topic: "The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004."
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a line graph titled 'Market share of three manufacturers of mobile phones', plotting market share as a percentage of sales from 1994 to 2004. For Motorola, the market share percentages were: 32% in 1994, 31% in 1995, 27% in 1996, 24% in 1997, 21.5% in 1998, 19.5% in 1999, 13.5% in 2000, 15.5% in 2001, 17% in 2002, 15.5% in 2003, and 17.5% in 2004. For Nokia, the percentages were: 21% in 1994, 23.5% in 1995, 20% in 1996, 19.5% in 1997, 22.5% in 1998, 27.5% in 1999, 30.5% in 2000, 35% in 2001, 37% in 2002, 36% in 2003, and 30% in 2004. For Sony Ericsson, the percentages were: 11% in 1994, 10% in 1995, 12.5% in 1996, 14% in 1997, 15.5% in 1998, 11.5% in 1999, 10.5% in 2000, 9% in 2001, 7.5% in 2002, 6.5% in 2003, and 9.5% in 2004.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph shows the percentage of mobile phone sales by three companies – Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson – from 1994 to 2004.

Overall, market share of Motorola was initially the highest but then it decreased over the period. The proportion of Nokia’s sales was relatively more stable at the beginning of the period and there was dramatic increase in its market share, becoming dominant at the end of the period. In contrast, the proportion of Sony Ericsson’s sales was the lowest throughout the period.

Motorola’s market share exhibited a downward trend overall. The company started the period with nearly 32% and this was followed by a considerable drop to approximately 15% in 2000. After declining, a minimal rise was seen in Motorola’s sales to about 17% in 2004. By contrast, Nokia showed an upward trend for most of the period. There was a slight rise to almost 23% in 1995, before dipping to nearly 20% in 1997. Manufacturer’s market share climbed consistently, reaching a peak at 37% in 2002. Although the proportion of Nokia’s sale dropped to almost 30% at the end of the period, it maintained its dominance in the market.

Sony Ericsson’s market share showed relatively smaller numbers. Despite declining to about 9%, sales increased gradually to 15% in 1998. Even though the figure for Sony Ericsson dropped steadily to almost 5% in 2003, there was a recovery to nearly 10% at the end of the period.

Word Count: 241

Answers On The Same Topic:

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The line graph compares the percentage of mobile phone sales among three companies over the period from 1994 to 2004. Overall, Nokia recorded the highest proportion of market share despite considerable fluctuation, whereas Sony Ericsson remained the lowest throughout the period, although Motorola witnessed a steady decline and showed only minor fluctuations over time. Nokia […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The line graph shows the percentage of mobile phone sales by Motorola, Nokia, and Sony Ericsson from 1994 to 2004. Overall, one manufacturer experienced an increase in their market share (Nokia), and two manufacturers witnessed a decrease in the proportion of total sales (Motorola, Sony Ericsson). Among the three manufacturers, Nokia showed the biggest rise, […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The graph shows the percentge of smat phone sales by three ways (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) from 1994 to 2004. In ditail. Even though Motorola biginning the highest level in the firs year from about 32%, plunge step by step. While Nokia started from 21%, it surged peak at 38% in 2002. However Sony […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

Overall, the Finnish company experienced a remarkable rise and became the clear industry leader by the end of the period, while the American brand saw a continual downturn. The Swedish manufacturer, meanwhile, remained the smallest competitor, showing only mild variations in its performance. In 1994, the US-based firm dominated the sector with just over 30% […]

See All

Other Topics:

The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

the given line graph illustrates amount of birth rates in China and USA between 1920 and 2000. overall, China had significant flactuations over the period and felt down by the end. The USA had not as flactuations as China, however had noteable decrease by the end. Additionally, both country were an identical level in the […]

The line graph below shows the amount of chicken, pizza, and fish consumed in a particular country from 1990 to 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the average amount of chicken, pizza, and fish consumed in a particular country over a period of 30 years starting from 1990 Overall, while the consumption of chicken and pizza witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for that of fish. Additionally, by the end of the period, the highest […]

The line graph shows the percentage of people who used three different types of transport (car, bus, and bicycle) to travel to work in a city between 2000 and 2020.

The presented bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who used different types of transport for commuting in a city in 2000 and 2020. Looking at the overall trends, it is evident that cars were the most commonly used means of transportation in 2020, whereas bicycles were the least used in 2000. Looking more closely […]

The graph below shows the sepending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countires between 1975 and 2000.

The line graph compares the amount of money spent on research in four different nations, namely Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and the UK, over the period from 1975 to 2000. The figures are given in dollars. Overall, it can be seen that Switzerland remained the highest-spending country on research and showed an upward trend, while Denmark […]

The line graph below shows the average weekly consumption of four types of drinks in a European country between 1980 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the average weekly consumption of four different types of drinks namely,milk,coffee,tea,and juice in a European county from 1980 to 2020. Overall,all off thes foure different types of drinks experienced fluctuation throughout the period,where the consumption of tea and juice an upward trend.In contrast,the milk and coffee was dawnward trend in the […]

The graph below shows the consumption of fish in different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

The line graph illustrates the consumption of 4 types of meat per person in a European country from 1979 to 2004. Overall, chicken consumption rose considerably and became the most popular type of meat by the end of the period. In contrast, beef and lamb consumption declined substantially, while fish remained relatively stable and was […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.