🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 9: "The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004."

Image for topic: "The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004."
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a line graph titled 'Market share of three manufacturers of mobile phones', plotting market share as a percentage of sales from 1994 to 2004. For Motorola, the market share percentages were: 32% in 1994, 31% in 1995, 27% in 1996, 24% in 1997, 21.5% in 1998, 19.5% in 1999, 13.5% in 2000, 15.5% in 2001, 17% in 2002, 15.5% in 2003, and 17.5% in 2004. For Nokia, the percentages were: 21% in 1994, 23.5% in 1995, 20% in 1996, 19.5% in 1997, 22.5% in 1998, 27.5% in 1999, 30.5% in 2000, 35% in 2001, 37% in 2002, 36% in 2003, and 30% in 2004. For Sony Ericsson, the percentages were: 11% in 1994, 10% in 1995, 12.5% in 1996, 14% in 1997, 15.5% in 1998, 11.5% in 1999, 10.5% in 2000, 9% in 2001, 7.5% in 2002, 6.5% in 2003, and 9.5% in 2004.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

Overall, the Finnish company experienced a remarkable rise and became the clear industry leader by the end of the period, while the American brand saw a continual downturn. The Swedish manufacturer, meanwhile, remained the smallest competitor, showing only mild variations in its performance.

In 1994, the US-based firm dominated the sector with just over 30% of total handset sales. However, its position declined steadily thereafter, dropping to roughly 15% in 2000 and reaching a low of nearly 10% in 2003. Although it improved slightly to about 12% in the final year, it still remained far below its initial level.

The Finnish producer began with approximately 22% and remained stable until 1997. It then witnessed a sharp surge, overtaking its American rival in 1998 and climbing to a peak of nearly 38% in 2002. Despite a modest fall to 30% in 2004, it retained a substantial lead over the other two companies.

The Swedish phone maker started with a 10% portion of global sales in 1994. This figure rose gradually to 15% by 1998 before slipping during the early 2000s. By 2003, its contribution had fallen to about 8%, though it recovered slightly to roughly 12% at the end of the timeframe.

In summary, the decade saw the Finnish manufacturer become the dominant force in the industry, the American company lose considerable ground, and the Swedish competitor remain a relatively minor player.

Word Count: 231

Answers On The Same Topic:

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The line graph compares the percentage of mobile phone sales among three companies over the period from 1994 to 2004. Overall, Nokia recorded the highest proportion of market share despite considerable fluctuation, whereas Sony Ericsson remained the lowest throughout the period, although Motorola witnessed a steady decline and showed only minor fluctuations over time. Nokia […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The line graph shows the percentage of mobile phone sales by three companies – Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson – from 1994 to 2004. Overall, market share of Motorola was initially the highest but then it decreased over the period. The proportion of Nokia’s sales was relatively more stable at the beginning of the period […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The line graph shows the percentage of mobile phone sales by Motorola, Nokia, and Sony Ericsson from 1994 to 2004. Overall, one manufacturer experienced an increase in their market share (Nokia), and two manufacturers witnessed a decrease in the proportion of total sales (Motorola, Sony Ericsson). Among the three manufacturers, Nokia showed the biggest rise, […]

“The line graph below illustrates the proportion of mobile phone sales by three manufacturers (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) between 1994 and 2004.”

The graph shows the percentge of smat phone sales by three ways (Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson) from 1994 to 2004. In ditail. Even though Motorola biginning the highest level in the firs year from about 32%, plunge step by step. While Nokia started from 21%, it surged peak at 38% in 2002. However Sony […]

See All

Other Topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the percentage of households with different types of technology in the UK between 1997 and 2001. Overall, it is true that the illustration provides the development of the percentage of the different households. CD player was widely used at the beginning and it demonstrated the highest proportion among other kinds of technology […]

The graph illustrates trendsin music buying habits between 2011 and 2018.

The presented line graph depics the trends in music purchasing hobbies from streams, downloads, CDs over the period of seven years, starting from 2011. Overall, it is evident that the trends in stream witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for downloads and CDs. Remarkably, CDs was the most popular trend in music habits […]

THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THREE COUNTRIES FROM 1990 TO 2004

The given graph represents the less opportunity ratio of people in the three nations UK, USA and Japan from1990 to 2004 0ver the duration of 14 years and unit is measured in the percentage. As an overall trend, it can be seen that the the ratio of unemployment in Japan decreased from the 1990 to […]

The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the percentage of households owning autos in the UK, over the 36-year period from 1971 to 2007. Overall, families without one car witnessed a substantial decline, whereas those with a car recorded little overall change. Additionally, an upward trend was shown by the rate of two-or-more-cars ownership. Nearly half of British […]

the graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three different metals during 2014

The given line graph illustrates the proportion of the price changes of copper, nickel and zinc in 2014 between January and December. Overall, fluctuations have been experienced in prices of each three materials during the given period. There were downward trends for both copper and nickel average prices change from January to May, whereas first […]

The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the United Kingdom by four different types of transport between 1980 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons

The line graph illustrates the number of goods delivered by various kinds of transport in the UK from 1980 to 2008. Overall, the road was the primary method of transport throughout the timeframe. In addition, moved by water and pipeline were also displayed nearly the same trend, rail experienced fluctuation. To begin with, trasnported by […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.