🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 5+: The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials --- paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

Image for topic: The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials --- paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays recycling rates from 1982 to 2010 for plastics, glass containers, aluminum cans, and paper & cardboard, measured in percent. For plastics: 1982-0%, 1986-10%, 1990-15%, 1994-20%, 1998-23%, 2002-25%, 2006-25%, 2010-30%. For glass containers: 1982-50%, 1986-45%, 1990-40%, 1994-35%, 1998-30%, 2002-30%, 2006-30%, 2010-35%. For aluminum cans: 1982-45%, 1986-50%, 1990-53%, 1994-55%, 1998-55%, 2002-60%, 2006-55%, 2010-50%. For paper & cardboard: starts at 60% in 1994, reaches 75% in 1998, 80% in 2002, 70% in 2006, and ends at 80% in 2010.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph ilustrate the percentage of recylcing rate of four different materials like paper & cardboard, Glass containers, Aluminium cans and Plastics from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Overall, the chart exhibit a general upward trend of reprocess rate. Paper & cardboard had the highest reuse rate throughout the period, while plastic remained the least reclaim rate. The recovering rate of Aluminium cans rose significantly but Glass containers had some fluctuations.

In 1982, the restore rate of Paper & cardboard stood at 65% and soared to reach it’s peak upto 80% in 1994. Although this figure declined gently upto 70% by 2010. However, the resue wage of Glass containers started from 50% in 1982, abruptly dropped upto 40% in 1990 and it took a gradual surge upto 60% by 2010.

The recycling percentage of Aluminium cans can clearly saw a dramatic increase over the period. Starting from 5% in1986, it grew up persistently nearly to 45% by 2010. In contrast, Plastics remained the least in chart starting from almost 2% in 1990 faced a slight increase upto 8% by 2010

Word Count: 183

Answers On The Same Topic:

The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials — paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

The line graph illustrates the findings of four disinct materials that were recycled between 1982 and 2010. The proportion was given in percentage. Overall, Aluminium cans showed substantial increment in recycled percentage through out the period. While, the recycling rate of Papers and cardboard fluctulated before consquent decline. However, recycling process for Plastics remained unchanged. […]

The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials — paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

The line graph illustrates the percentages of the procedure of the reprocess of four different materials in a particular country between 1982 to 2010. Overall, the graph depicts the peak level of paper and cardboard in 1994.while the lowest proportion of the plastics in 1990. In 1982 the paper and cardboard have the recycle rate […]

The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials — paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

The line graph gives information regarding the ratio of four different materials such as paper & cardboard, glass containers, alumininium cans and plastics that were recycled between1982 to 2010 in particular country. Overall, it is clear that almost all four shows upward trend. However, aluminium cans incresed dramatically while plasctic shows least one. In 1982, […]

The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials — paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

The proportion of four distinct materials that were recycled between 1982 and 2010 is illustrated in the chart. Overall, the trend of the four materials stayed the same, with paper and carboard being the most recycled materials. It is then followed by glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics respectively. Paper and cardboard and glass container […]

The line graph gives the information about recycling rate (in percentages)for four selected materials — paper & cardboard, glass containers , aluminum cans and plastic during a 28-year period from 1982 to 2010

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four types of materials – paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics – in one country between 1982 and 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard consistently accounted for the highest proportion of recycled materials, despite a gradual decline after the mid-1990s. Glass containers ranked second throughout […]

See All

Other Topics:

Percentage of first year teachers with regular teaching jobs by year of graduation

The line chart illustrates the percentage of first-year teachers with regular teaching jobs by year of graduation from 2001 to 2007 in Ontario. Overall, the data is presented every one years. Additionally, the illustartion provides information about English and French language teachers. In 2007, the percentage of first-year English language teachers accounted for the lowest […]

Task 1: The line graph shows the percentages of Australian exports with four countries.

The line chart illustrates how the proportion of Austrialin exponts changed in four different countries over a period 22 years, starting from years. were Overall, it can be seen that there were upwared trends in the China, US and India wheras the Japan was showed a downwand trend over a perciod. According to the chant, […]

The line graph provides data on the quantity of parcels delivered by two major mail service companies, FedEx and TNT, between 1920 and 2000.

The line graph illustrates how many parcels were transported by FedEx and TNT mail services companies over the 80 years between 1920 and 2000. Overall, TNT company deliveries showed a significant increase over the period shown until being more popular. Although the number of items delivered by FedEx fluctuated, this figure remained dominant for most […]

The chart below gives information about car ownership in households in the UK between 1951 and 2007.

The line graph illustrates car ownership in Britain from 1951 to 2007. Overall, almost all figures, namely, people who owned one car, two cars and, three or more cars followed an upward trend. The reverse was true for no car ownership, despite being the most common option to at the beginning of the period. As […]

Task 1: The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories.

The line graph compares the average number of hours required to manufacture vehicles in the US by four car companies – General Motor, Ford, Toyota and Honda – between 1998 and 2005. Overall, the time needed to produce cars generally declined over the period, especially for General Motor and Ford. Japanese manufacturers, Toyota and Honda, […]

The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular country between 1978 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the proportion of people by age bracket who visited the cinema at least once a month in a specific nation from 1978 to 2008. Overall, it is clear that there were some minor fluctuations in the rates of people of all ages going to the cinema. Additionally, young adults aged 14-24 […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.