The provided pie charts display the evaluation of both undergraduate and postgraduate students regarding the variety of book titles and handwriting materials in their university library.
Overall, undergraduates generally rated the variety of books and non-printed materials in their library better than postgraduates. On the contrary, there was a large proportion of postgraduates who found two kinds of study materials bad.
As can be seen from the category of ‘Range of books’, 37% of undergraduates rated it as very good compared to 12% of postgraduates. Additionally, 35% of undergraduates were satisfied with the selection, which was higher than the 28% of the satisfied postgraduates. Meanwhile, exactly a half of the postgraduates indicated that the range of books was not good according to their evaluation compared to 28% of undergraduates.
In terms of ‘Non-print materials’, the percentage of undergraduates who evaluated them as ‘very good’ was 68%, which was nearly 7 times the figure for ‘not good’ at 12%. Meanwhile, most postgraduates answered ‘not good’ when they were surveyed, at 62%, the highest percentage of negative reviews, and only 16% of people in this group chose the ‘very good’ option.