The pie charts compare how satisfied the undergraduates and postgraduates be with learning resources including books and non-printed materials in their school.
Overall, while half of the interviewed postgraduates felt the range of books provided are not good, the student thought they were very good. In addition, non-printed materials were considered very good mainly by the undergraduate, compared to the not good quality said by the postgraduate. Regarding the range of books, the number of students said they were very good and satisfaction were nearly the same, at 37% and 35% respectively. This similar pattern can be seen in the figure for the graduated group, with negligible percentages, at 22% and 28% in that order. However, 50% of the postgraduate felt not good about the books, which roughly doubled that of the student, with 28%.
In terms of non-printed materials, the percentage of students reported this kind of resource were very good was 68% compared to 12% of the postgraduate. In contrast, 62% of graduated students weren’t satisfied with non-printed materials, which was over five times than the figure for students, at 12%. The number of students and graduated students satisfied with this learning resource was approximately the same the respective proportions were 20% and 22%.