The chart depicts the figures for the diversity of books and non-printed materials in the school library of undergraduates and postgraduates.
Overall, there are explicitly two different tendencies in judgment of the range of books and non-printed materials from the two examined figures. Noticeably, while more postgraduates thought the range of books was very good and underrated non-printed materials, undergraduates had a completely opposite view.
To commence with the range of books, it is obvious that half of postgraduates assessed a high rate for this type, which is nearly double that of undergraduates (28%). It is only recorded that 28% and 22% of postgraduates felt satisfied with and thought books not good, respectively, yet just 35% of undergraduates had satisfaction and 37% rated these as not good.
Moving to non-printed materials, contrary to the range of books, 68% of undergraduates judged these very good, which is higher than that of postgraduates (only 12%). With not good comments, there are about 12% of postgraduates, which is less than six times the data of undergraduates at 62%. Moreover, the percentage of satisfied postgraduates and undergraduates are equal at 22% and 20%, respectively.
