Table

Band 7+: The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image details electricity generation in Germany for 1990 and 2010: Coal 57% in 1990, 45% in 2010; Nuclear 22% in 1990, 23% in 2010; Natural Gas 8% in 1990, 13% in 2010; Hydro 4% in 1990, 5% in 2010; Renewable 2% in 1990, 12% in 2010; Other 7% in 1990, 2% in 2010.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

This table compares the proportions of six diffferent sources of electricity production in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

Overall, the figures for coal and other sources decreased while the proportions of remianing sources increased.

In detail, in 1990, coal made up more than half of the electricity generation in Germany, at 57%, whereas the figure for nuclear power was relatively lower at 22%. Meanwhile, the corresponding figures for the remaining sources were no more than 10%.

In 2010, the figure for coal had decreased by 12% at 45%. Likewise, the proportion of other sources also declined to 2%. By contrast, the figures for natural gas and renewable energy sources climbed sharply from 8% to 13% and 2% to 12%, respectively. Finally, the figures for nuclear and hydro power had also increased by 1%, reaching 23% and 5%, respectively.

Word Count: 138

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

7.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

sources: 6

figures: 4

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by providing a clear overview and detailed comparison of the energy sources between 1990 and 2010. The data is presented accurately, and the structure is logical. Minor spelling errors ('diffferent', 'remianing') and a slight omission of the 'Other' category in the overview are present, but these do not detract from the overall clarity and completeness. To improve, ensure all categories are mentioned in the overview and proofread for spelling. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is well-organized with a clear overall structure: introduction, overview, and detailed paragraphs for each time period. The use of cohesive devices (e.g., 'Overall', 'In detail', 'By contrast', 'Finally') helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. However, the overview could be slightly more comprehensive by explicitly stating the most significant change (e.g., the rise in renewables). Additionally, the transition between the two time periods could be smoother, perhaps by using a clearer linking phrase. Overall, the message is easy to follow, and any lapses are minimal.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a good range of vocabulary appropriate for the task, such as 'proportions', 'sources of electricity production', 'made up', 'relatively lower', 'climbed sharply', and 'declined'. There is some attempt at paraphrasing (e.g., 'proportions' vs. 'figures'). However, there are a few spelling errors (e.g., 'diffferent', 'remianing') and some repetition of 'figures' and 'respectively'. To improve, consider using more varied synonyms (e.g., 'percentages', 'shares', 'accounted for') and ensure correct spelling. The lexical range is adequate but not fully sophisticated.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including comparative forms ('more than half', 'relatively lower'), past tense usage ('made up', 'had decreased'), and complex sentences with 'whereas' and 'by contrast'. Punctuation is generally correct. However, there are minor errors: 'diffferent' (spelling), 'remianing' (spelling), and a slight awkwardness in 'the figures for nuclear and hydro power had also increased by 1%, reaching 23% and 5%, respectively' (could be phrased more naturally). Overall, the grammar is accurate enough to convey the message clearly, but there is room for improvement in accuracy and naturalness.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table illustrates the proportions of electricity generated from six different sources in Germany in 1990 and 2010. Overall, coal was the primary source of electricity in both years, despite a significant decline in its usage. Conversely, there was a substantial increase in the reliance on renewable energy and natural gas. In 1990, coal accounted […]

Band 9

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table illustrates the amount of different sources used in order to generate electricity in the European country of Germany in 1990 and 2010. Units are measured in percentage Overall, the usage of coal contributed to producing electricity most in both 1990 and 2010. On the other hand, neither renewable, nor hydro sources were not […]

Band 7+

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table illustrates a Propotion of a Various kinds of energy sources in Germany between 1990 to 2010. Overall, Coal remained the most dominant electricity source, taking almost half of all energy sources. In general, every source of energy grew since 1990, Nevertheless other variants of energy and coal decreased. The relevance of the renewable […]

Band 5+

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

the table belows has illustrates the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in germany in 1990 – 2010. overall, the most energy used was coal that reach an high increased at 1990 and had a plumment in 2010. at the first stage, in 1990 several energy sources such as coal and nuclear […]

Band 4+

See All

The pie charts below show the proportions of different categories of household spending in a particular country in 2000 and 2020.

The pie charts illustrate the spending habits of people in India in 2000 and 2020. It is clear that food was the highest spending habit in 2000, while housing became largest share in 2020. Entertainment and education consistently accounted the lowest share in both years. In 2000, food spending habits was the largest category approximately, […]

Band 6+

The table below shows information about spending on health in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the variety percentages of money that has spend for health in Japan,Italy,Germany,France and USA in 2002. It has 3 type of category which are public spending, private spending and lastly the total. Overall France has the highest total percentages that allocate money in health while Japan has the lowest total percentages that […]

Band 5+

The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

The table compares the number of motor vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants in eight different countries in 1990 and 2000. Overall, the number of vehicles increased in most countries over the period, with the Bahamas being the only country to experience a decline, while Cambodia recorded no change. Luxembourg had the highest figure in 1990, whereas […]

Band 9

The charts below show the percentage of people using different types of transportation in a city in 2000 and 2025.

The given table compares the proportion of commuters utilizing six different modes of transport in three specific years: 2000, 2010, and 2020. Overall, the metro, bicycles, and motorcycles experienced an upward trend in usage, with bicycles recording the most substantial growth. Conversely, cars, buses, and walking dropped noticeably over the years, although cars remained by […]

Band 8+

See All

Band 7+: The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

The table below shows the proportion of different energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany in 1990 and 2010.

Other Topics:

The pie charts below show the proportions of different categories of household spending in a particular country in 2000 and 2020.

The table below shows information about spending on health in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the daily production of oil in four African countries between 2000 and 2004, measured in barrels per day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

The charts below show the percentage of people using different types of transportation in a city in 2000 and 2025.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium