🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Table

Band 6+: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.

Image for topic: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image presents a table with five columns: "Area", "Students", "Very satisfied", "Quite satisfied", and "Not at all satisfied". Under "Study facilities in bedrooms", figures are: "Postgraduate students" with 65% very satisfied, 20% quite satisfied, and 15% not at all satisfied; and "Undergraduate students" with 67% very satisfied, 17% quite satisfied, and 26% not at all satisfied. Under "University cafeteria", figures are: "Postgraduate students" with 52% very satisfied, 32% quite satisfied, and 16% not at all satisfied; and "Undergraduate students" with 70% very satisfied, 27% quite satisfied, and 3% not at all satisfied. Under "Social facilities", figures are: "Postgraduate students" with 80% very satisfied, 15% quite satisfied, and 5% not at all satisfied; and "Undergraduate students" with 45% very satisfied, 25% quite satisfied, and 30% not at all satisfied.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The table illustrates the satisfaction percentages of university facilities among students in the UK in 2004. Overall, satisfaction levels varied considerably among students. Most students were very satisfied with all facilities, especially with study facilities in dormrooms, while the most highest unsatisfaction levels were seen in social facilities among undergraduates.

When it comes to bedrooms’ study facilities, both graduate students made up different proportions. Very satisfied students accounted for the largest share, representing 65% among postgraduate students and 67% among undergraduate ones. 20% of postgraduate students are content about their bedroom convinience, compared to 17 % of undergraduate students. Figures for those who were not at all satisfied acconted for 15 % and 26 % respectively.

Regarding the cafeteria of a university, very satisfied postgraduate students made up 52%, much lower than undergraduate students’ share, which presented 70%. Whereas postgraduates were quite satisfied at 32% and undergraduates just below 27%. A large difference were recorded in satisfaction ratings among students who were not at all satisfied, with postgraduate students comprising 16% and undergraduates only 3%.

In terms of social facilities, there is a gap between two graduate students, with postgraduates consisting of 80% and undergraduate ones 45%. 15% of postgraduate students were content with social feacilities, compared with 25% of undergraduate coterparts. Not at all ssatisfied students comprised merely 5% and 30 % respectively.

Word Count: 224

Other Topics:

The table shows overseas visitors to London and other parts of the UK in 1996 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares the percentage of foreign travellers and the UK travellers in London city over a 5-year period, starting from 1996. Overall, the table chart highlights significant variations in visitors, where overseas visitors recorded the highest number, while the United Kingdom experienced the fewest visitors. Furthermore, holiday was the most common reason for all […]

The chart shows the distance covered in various modes of transport.

The chart delineates the average annual distance traveled per person, measured in miles, across various modes of transport, comparing data from 1985 and 2000. Overall, the total distance traveled by all modes increased substantially over the 15-year period. While car usage dominated and experienced the most significant rise, walking, cycling, and local bus travel saw […]

the table below shows the usual method of travel to work for people in Sydney and Adelaide in 2011 and 2016

The table illustrates the basic method of travel to job for individuals in Sydney and Adelaide in 2011 and 2016. Overall, utilizing the train, bus, and bicycle increased in the both countries. In contrast, using a car and by foot are presented a decline movement. While other transport methods is used a remained stable, in […]

the table below shows the usual method of travel to work for people in Sydney and Adelaide in 2011 and 2016

The table illustrates the usual methods of going to the work for employees in Sydney and Adelaide in 2011 and 2016. Overall, utilizing the train, bus and bicycle showed an increasing movement for both cites, while using a car and by feet presented a declining movement. In contrast, in Sydney is used for other methods […]

The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages).

The table compares 9 distinct countries in terms of the number of tourist visitors in two different periods: 2009 and 2010. Overall, France was the most visited country in both years despite recording no growth, whereas Hong Kong was the only country to record a decrease. Germany experienced by far the most significant growth, with […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.