🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!

Table

Band 5+: The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image contains a table displaying Worldwide Mobile phone Sales percentages in 2005 & 2006, segmented by Company: Nokia (2005: 32.5%, 2006: 35%), Motorola (2005: 17.7%, 2006: 21.1%), Samsung (2005: 12.7%, 2006: 11.8%), Sony Ericsson (2005: 6.3%, 2006: 7.4%), L.G (2005: 6.7%, 2006: 6.3%), BenQ Mobile (2005: 4.9%, 2006: 2.4%), Others (2005: 19.2%, 2006: 16.2%), with TOTAL market share for both years being 100.0%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given table represent the different kind of branded mobile phone produced throughout the world from 2005 to 2006 .

It is evident that, the company comparatively nearly the similar proportion in both years in the share market. However ,Nokia exponentially highest to other brand smartphone .

To commence with, In 2005, Nokia industries were quite famous in the share market which was 32.5%. In addition, Nokia grew marginally by 2.5% in 2006. Inspite of this, Motorola brand also slightly escalate from 17.7% to 21.1% in the next year. Similarly, the company of Samsung smartphone slightly dropped down which was 12.7% to 11.8% in the year 2005 and 2006.

In the following year ,between 2005 and 2006 ,the organisation of Sony Ericsson LG and Benq cellular phones were nearly between the range of 2.4% to 7.4%. In paradox to this, miscellaneous brands were 19.2% in 2005 and gradually decreased by 16.2% in the year 2006. On the whole the share market completely 100% rate in both the years.

Word Count: 168

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

share: 3

market: 3

nokia: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The response provides an overview of the main features of the table, highlighting the market share percentages of different mobile phone manufacturers in 2005 and 2006. However, there are some inaccuracies and omissions in the report, such as not mentioning all the companies listed in the table and not making comparisons where relevant.

Coherence & Cohesion

4.5

The report is somewhat coherent and cohesive, with some attempt at paragraphing. However, there are issues with sentence structure and coherence, making it slightly challenging to follow in some parts.

Lexical Resource

4.5

There is an attempt to use a range of vocabulary, but there are inaccuracies and awkward phrasings throughout the report. More precise and accurate word choices could enhance the lexical resource.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

4.5

While a variety of grammatical structures are attempted, there are several grammatical errors and awkward constructions present. Improvements in sentence structure and grammar accuracy are needed for a higher score.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart information about worldwide manufacturing of mobile phone in 2005 and 2006. Overall, the percentage of worldwide market share of mobile phone to manufacturing of Nokia mobile phone was highest in 2006 and the lowest percentage of market share of mobile manufacturing was Ben Q mobile in 2006. 2005, the most word-wide percentage of […]

Band 4+

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table demonstrates data on market share of mobile company all over the world throughout year 2005 to 2006. it is evident that some comoanies share incresed from 2005 to 2006 whereas some did not do that well and lost some of it’s share. companies like nokia and motorola had a considerably upword trend […]

Band 4+

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the global market share of mobile phone manufacturers in 2005 and 2006. Overall, Sony Ericsson, Nokia, and Motorola were the only companies to experience growth in market share from 2005 to 2006. Nokia and Motoralo remained the leading companies in both years, while BenQ Mobile consistently held the smallest proportion of the […]

Band 8+

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table delineates the leading mobile phone producers in terms of their share of the global market in 2005 and 2006. Overall, it is clear that Nokia had the highest market share in both years. While the percentage of the market share of most companies fell, the opposite was seen in the figures for […]

Band 8+

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table presents a comparative analysis of the global mobile phone market share among various manufacturers for the years 2005 and 2006. Notably, Nokia maintained its dominance in the market throughout this period, while BenQ Mobile consistently recorded the lowest share. Overall market dynamics revealed variations in the performance of several key players. In 2005, […]

Band 9

See All

Band 5+: The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The table below gives information about the amount of water used in three different sectors in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Canada. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives information about the average hours spent on the internet by European people of different age groups.

The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who chose different subjects at a university in 2000 and 2010.

The table below gives information about the amount of water used in three different sectors in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Canada. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the average amount of time per week that people in three age groups spent on different leisure activities in a particular country in 2025.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium