Line Graph

Band 6+: Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a line graph detailing U.S. government spending on research in billions of dollars ($B) from 1980 to 2008 across five categories. The data points for each year are as follows: Health (1980: $8.2B, 1984: $7.2B, 1988: $10B, 1992: $13B, 1996: $15B, 2000: $16.5B, 2004: $22B, 2008: $18B); Space (1980: $6B, 1984: $5.5B, 1988: $6.2B, 1992: $7B, 1996: $8B, 2000: $8.2B, 2004: $8.5B, 2008: $9.5B); Energy (1980: $5B, 1984: $5B, 1988: $5B, 1992: $5.5B, 1996: $7.8B, 2000: $5B, 2004: $5.5B, 2008: $7.5B); General Science (1980: $2.5B, 1984: $2.6B, 1988: $3.8B, 1992: $3B, 1996: $5B, 2000: $5B, 2004: $5.1B, 2008: $5.3B); and Other (1980: $7.8B, 1984: $5B, 1988: $5.1B, 1992: $5.5B, 1996: $7.8B, 2000: $8.1B, 2004: $7.8B, 2008: $5B).

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The graph illustrates information about United States government funded the same research such as health, space, energy, and general science, others from 1980 to 2008.

Overall, health research experienced a significant increase throughout the given period, while the figure for space, energy, and general science slightly grew. However, the number of other scientists has declined.

The figure for health, and others were the largest in the initial period. The number of funding for health research in 1980 stood at $8 billion, whereas the number of funding for others research amounted to $7 billion. The health figure rose sharply to approximately $16 billion and peaked at just over $23 billion in 2004. It then fell dramatically to about $18 billion in 2008. Meanwhile, the number of another research decreased slightly to $5 billion in 1984 and remained stable to 1988, in addition, the figure climbed to $8 billion and declaimed by $3 billion

Regarding space, energy, and general science, funding for space research stood at approximately $6 billion in 1980. This figure fluctuated slightly over the years before rising to nearly $9 billion in 2008. Similarly, expenditure on energy research started at $5 billion, reached a peak of around $7.5 billion in 1996, and after falling back to $5 billion in 2000, it climbed to $7.5 billion by the end of the period. Finally, general science received the lowest amount of funding throughout the graph, starting at $2.5 billion in 1980 and gradually increasing to $5 billion in 2000, where it remained stable until 2008

Word Count: 254

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

6.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

billion: 15

research: 7

health: 5

figure: 5

space: 4

energy: 4

general: 4

science: 4

number: 4

funding: 4

others: 3

period: 3

slightly: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by providing an overview and describing the main trends for each category. The overall structure is clear, with a logical progression from general trends to specific details. However, there are some inaccuracies in the data (e.g., health spending in 1980 and 2004, and the peak for energy in 1996) and a few awkward phrasings (e.g., 'declaimed by $3 billion'). To improve, ensure data is reported accurately and use more precise language. Additionally, the description of 'Other' could be more detailed, and the final sentence about general science could be clarified to avoid ambiguity about the period of stability.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. The progression of ideas is logical, and the use of cohesive devices is mostly effective. However, some sentences are long and could be broken down for better clarity. The paragraphing is adequate, but the second body paragraph could be more focused, as it mixes trends for different categories without clear separation. To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear central topic and use a range of linking words and referencing to enhance flow.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a good range of vocabulary related to trends (e.g., 'significant increase', 'fluctuated', 'peaked', 'declined') and demonstrates flexibility in describing data. There are some inaccuracies and awkward phrasings, such as 'the number of other scientists' and 'declaimed by $3 billion', which detract from precision. To improve, use more precise and natural collocations (e.g., 'expenditure on', 'the figure for') and avoid informal or incorrect terms. Overall, the lexical resource is adequate but not consistently sophisticated. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report attempts to use a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences, but there are several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that affect clarity. For example, 'United States government funded the same research' is missing a relative pronoun, and 'the number of funding' is incorrect. There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and article usage. To improve, review grammar rules for relative clauses, countable/uncountable nouns, and ensure each sentence is grammatically complete. With more accurate grammar and punctuation, the report would be more effective.

Answers On The Same Topic:

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

The line graph provides information about US government expenditure on five different areas ( Health , space, energy, general science and others) from 1980 to 2008 . Overall , it is clear that the US government spent the largest amount of money on Health while the least amount of money spent on researching general science, […]

Band 6+

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

The line graph illustrates the U.S government’s expediture on research on five fields (Health, space, energy, general science and other) from 1980 and 2008. Overall, it is evident from the chart that Health was always prioritized by the U.S government, while the least amount of money was spent on researching General Science. Moreover, there was […]

Band 6+

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

The line graph compares how government in America spent on research over the 28-year period from 1980. Overall, U.S. authority investing on health dominated in five categories. Besides, other research attracted less attention from government. Looking in the graph, it can be seen that spending on health research was the highest figure during the 28 […]

Band 5+

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

The line chart provide the research expenditure of government during the period from 1980 to 2008. Overall, the number of finance of health, space, energy and general science increased over the period, while those to other sector witnessed the reverse trend. Additionally, the researching in health field showed the most significant growth and maintained its […]

Band 6+

See All

The chart provides research on the number of times Australian adolescents ate fast food annually in twenty-five years, from 1975 to 2000.

The line graph illustrates the number of times in fast food consumptions by Australian teenagers between 1975 and 2000. Overall, it is clear to see from the chart that the consumption numbers of pizza and hamburgers increased significantly, while the numbers of fish decreased over the period. The data on hamburgers and pizza demonstrate a […]

Band 7+

The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001.

The graph illustrates the propotion of of workers from; Netherlands, France , Sweden, United Kingdom and Germany that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2000. Overall, Netherlands showed and increasing trend whereas Germany showcased a decreasing trend over the years. To begin with, Netherlands showed a dramatic rise […]

Band 4+

See All

Band 6+: Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Topic: The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.

Other Topics:

The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The chart provides research on the number of times Australian adolescents ate fast food annually in twenty-five years, from 1975 to 2000.

The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001.

The graph below shows the average number of hours per week that teenagers in one country spent on four leisure activities between 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium