The report provides a track of students’ progress who used Perfomica to improve their academical performance, depicting data from September to December, with strengths and criteria to improve by also setting aims for continuous upgrade.
Overall, the report assesses three indicators such as average grade, goal achievement, and peer feedback quality.
Goal achievement was represented by the lowest number in the beginning of the period, by around 60%. Peer feedback quality was approximately the same, while the average grade index was leading by almost a tenth. Despite the fact that all the factors experienced an eventual incensement , goal achievement and average grade’s scores were growing steadily, maintaining a stable rate of KPIS, whereas feedback quality fluctuated. Its score reached the highest peak of 90% in November and dropped by approximately a tenth to December. Average grade’s indicators remained with the biggest score, excelling goal achievement by a tenth.
During upcoming months, the application’s team ought to concentrate on the goal achievement factor, moderately strengthening them through their users’ wishes. Furthermore, they are supposed to keep the current level of feedback, since it will assist to fulfill the previous recommendation.
In general, the performance was evidently improved. The student conveyed notable determination in studying, simultaneously. However, there is room for further growth.