Nowadays many parents and teachers of the students think that activities of the children must be controlled. However there are some people who believe that children must raise-up being free. In my view, both sides have valid points, and a balanced approach is necessary.
Those who support the idea that children must be strict controlled claim that, when children grew up at difficult condition, he will understand the value of things that surround him. Moreover, sometimes kids don’t understand the meaning and conclusion of their actions and this can lead to poor security qualities, whereas adults notice if there is any harmful thing. Frankly speaking, it will lessen the detrimental habits.In addition teachers should monitor their pupils to ensure about his studies, or schools oversee students during the break time.If they don’t control them strictly ,there is tendency that they will fight with each other.
Some people argue that supervising children too closely can do more harm than good. One major concern is that constant monitoring reduces a child’s independence, because they rely on adults for every decision instead of learning to think for themselves. Additionally, excessive supervision may limit creativity, as children feel less free to explore, make small mistakes, and learn from them. For example, in families where parents control every activity many teenagers struggle to solve simple problems on their own. Therefore, critics believe that too much control can prevent children from developing essential life skills.
To conclude,although some people believe that children should be closely supervised to ensure their safety and discipline,others argue that too much conrol can limit their independence and personal growth.In my opinion,a balanced approach is the best,where adults guide children when necessary but also allows them enough freedom to develop essential life skills.