Unlike children, adults’ ability of self-learning is significant and reliable. That adults have acquired an incredible amount of knowledge via their experiences is a great asset that can help them think logically based on a predefined mechanism, which allows them to learn whatever soft skill independently. By contrast, some people suggest that adults be taught formally in class regarding these procedures with guidance from experts, not only in terms of boosting their motivation but also with regard to time-saving. In this essay, a discussion of both ideas will be demonstrated along with the author’s opinion.
To begin with, it is obvious that there are numerous splendid effects on personal development that self-study in a practical working environment brings about. Not only does it help strengthen transferrable skills such as critical thinking, research, and planning, but it offers a great number of opportunities for learners to expand their horizons and improve their teamwork, communication, and leadership skills from hands-on experience with self-reflection and feedback from colleagues and senior employees. One notable example is the management trainee program often used by large corporations to recruit the best candidates who suit their agenda after one to two years of working together. However, one drawback of this approach is that since it takes place in real-life scenarios instead of simulating classrooms, the consequences might be costly, plus they cannot be undone.
On the other hand, training with mentors will equip adults with different techniques and strategies that are useful in developing these skills, which might take less time than self-learning to complete. Besides, it is safe to apply all knowledge acquired and practice with teachers and peers via in-class activities including role-plays, discussions, case studies, and projects. Nevertheless, there might be a lack of chances for learners to gain more industrial insights about real challenges as well as advice from practitioners, which can be considered as a disadvantage, compared to the previous option.
To sum up, the two approaches mentioned above have their advantages and downside. Whereas independent learning through direct participation in the industry and workplaces gives each individual opportunities to earn practical lessons, studying with a teacher allows more room for trial and error and getting support from classmates. From my point of view, a combination of the two would reasonably work as they can compensate for each other, helping learners shape a multi-dimensional perspective in empirical study.