There have been some proposals about excogitating an unprecedented language to amplify effective communication and elude discrimination. By my reckoning, even though it can be beneficial in some aspects, such as avoiding racism, equalizing the distribution of wealth, and promoting common knowledge, it is infeasible.
The advantages of utilizing an international language include simplification of trading between countries, elimination of segregation on lingual accounts, and easier access to knowledge and entertainment. Allegedly the absence of a cosmopolitan language is one of the main economic constraints. English is a language employed in a majority of countries. This causes non-English countries to be economically disadvantaged in comparison with English-speaking countries. Devising a new language will omit these heterogeneities. Leveling the economic ground results in even development in all countries throughout the world, despite their current native languages. Another privilege of access to such a language is simplifying access to groundbreaking knowledge and cutting-edge technology and even to recent movies and books.
However, the disadvantages of this intention are the hindrances that make it almost impossible. This idea is insurmountable even with considerable effort. The sheer complexity of the problem is the staggering financial resources demanded by this proposal. Moreover, it is difficult for many people to start learning a new language from the starting point. I believe that these reasons lead to the contravention of this theory at this point.
Personally, I have come to the conclusion that masterminding a novel language may be a theoretical possibility, but in reality it requires many prerequisites that are not available at the current moment. But perhaps, by employing the newest technologies and handling the obstacles in this path, this idea may be accessible to new generations.