Fruits and vegetables are now increasingly transported by aircraft, leading some to argue that it is beneficial for countries, while others disagree. While air transport may have environmental disadvantages, I strongly believe it is both necessary and practical.
One major advantage of airplane transport is its ability to diversify culinary options. Due to arid landscapes and extreme temperatures, extensive agriculture is unsustainable in countries such as Mongolia and Saudi Arabia. Airplanes transport fruits and vegetables from producers to such regions despite geographical boundaries. As a result, the restaurants in those nations offer a variety of dishes to customers. This service boosts local economies by increasing revenues for businesses and expanding the tax base.
Another significant benefit is its contribution to exports. Due to insufficient funds, agriculturally-driven economies often lack sufficient infrastructure to export their goods. Producers therefore rely heavily on rapid transport by aircraft to boost productivity. Argentina and Brazil clearly illustrate this, where agricultural products are largely exported to nations in Caribbean islands without delay. Without airplane transport, farmers may find it difficult to sustain their competitive edge in the long run.
Admittedly, an excessive usage of airplanes in transport raises the carbon footprint. Some studies from environmental organizations suggest emissions from airplanes damage the ozone layer. However, this issue can be effectively addressed by shifting to other modes of transport. Indonesia now increasingly uses ferries and railways to export their goods, as they generate far less emission compared to airplanes. In addition, their high load capacity can consolidate transport frequency, considerably reducing carbon emission.
In conclusion, although airplane transport may harm the ecosystem, its advantages far outweigh its drawbacks. In a globalized world, not only is air transport desired, but it is also essential.