Many people strong hold the belief that advertisment may brings some benefits for watchers and should be completly remove. From my persepctive, despite some plausible reason to support this view, it is still insufficeientlt convincing. This essay aims to shed light on teh rationale of my argument.
On the one hand, it is undersandable why this view gain popularity, its advocates often argue that some people might be annoye when they are interrupted by some adverts.For example, when they are watching some educational or tutorial video on Youtube,then a pops-up appears and interrupt the flow of their studying, so that they can lose the concentration and are distracted by these hilarious or interseting advertisement, and evenly affect negatively on the ability of absorbing knowlegde. Besides, there are some advertisements about low-quality or scam products that could be moneyless and harmful for customers. Therefore, these contents could be entirely remove to guarantee experience of watchers.
On orther hand, my conviction is that enforcing an outright prohibition for all products may cause adversity to chân chính company. In detail, these company who sell some high quality and helpful commodity cannot promote about their products, leading to an significant decrease in the ratio of sale and mass damage in economy. A coroppration, thus, may facing to the stagnation and bankupt, which directly dẫn đến the lacking of government’s taxes and deterioration national economy. Another consequence is that workers may loose their daily income and cannot afford to living cost. Therefore, banning completetly these medium of promotion is unviable and could be suitable for a few kinds of advert.
In conclusion, although some disadvantage about distraction and the low quality of these advertisements, government should not prohibit all advert, making it solely for some helpless ones.