At the present time tourists are visiting to locations where are difficult ecosystem, like sahara or artic. I try to provide both benefits and drawbacks for tourists, also give my personal opinion for this statement.
On the one hand, visiting such a places like Sahara or Arctic has a crucial role for tourists. This is because, tourists experience invaluable period which they cannot find from anywhere. For example, seeing various and unexpected challenges. In the below places does not available any residential zones, restaurants, at least hotel. But these reasons can not be to discouragement. Just because person can acclimatize to everywhere. As a result, tourists bolster health with unspoiled air, relax without any technology in the real environment. Finally, traveling to nature shows the meaning of the real relaxion.
On the other hand, have a trip to Sahara or Arctic can bring several issues. Looking to environmental perspective, often the open space locations are not eliminated from harmful insects or animals. The plenty of creatures acclimatized to biodiversity secretly, in the landfill, refuse, beyond rock or just covered trees. For example, the New York times recent wrote that, over 40% of tourists which traveled to river Amazon have infected by unknown insects. This research clearly shows that, it is extremely dangerous for tourists to visit open nature.
In conclusion, although the outstanding experience of travel to environment in difficult condition, the person can get a serious sick by nature itself. I also think that tourists should choose more residential zones to travel than going to unsafe places.