It is proposed that remote and distant places should be excavated in search of energy sources such oil and gas. While pursuing these energy sources in these areas may bring benefits to us, it is my contention that the disadvantages of such advocacy far outweigh its advantages.
On the one hand, it is understandable as to why people made such a suggestion. The first and foremost positive effect would be the instant provision of more energy sources to meet the growing demand. In the 21st century, there are more and more economic activities which necessitate the use of oil and gas as shown in transports and entertainment. Additionally, the population growth has tremendously increased household energy consumption. In other words, energy consumption is evident, ranging from daily basic needs to business levels. Furthermore, opening up a distant and untouched region for search energy sources can drive economic development of that region. Subsequently, local residents are able to benefit from it by getting employment opportunities to alter their living quality.
While the above arguments have its role to play in a sense, it is not to be overlooked that this proposition has a devastating influence on the environment. Have these regions been opened up for obtaining more oil and gas, they will be heavily polluted, which can lead to a ripple of effects such as loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation resulted from severe pollution problems. Moreover, the issue of energy sources requires worldwide attention and long-term planning in that people should seek alternative energy sources in case the current storage of oil and gas is used up the day when we face energy depletion.
In conclusion, every coin has two sides, and it is crucial that we should be aware of what we want to make an informed decision. To ensure a sustainable development, it would be best for the government to develop alternative energy source such as green energy to meet the continuous increasing demand of energy consumption.