In the era of globalization, the use of the English language has been tremendous in the globe, making communication more effective than ever before. Despite the many benefits, having one universal language might have some negative effects, especially with the nation’s uniqueness.
Having one general language gives more opportunities to break down barriers for people and can be beneficial for building better communication skills. Having one spoken language will help people exchange their cultures and bring them closer to each other. For instance, during international gatherings such as the Olympic Games or the Football World Cup, numerous fans gather to support their favorites, and English would help connect different nations. Additionally, many universities now require fluency in English for admission to educational programs, and knowing English is a positive feature that makes it easier to enroll in top-ranked universities. Hence, there are chances to become a highly qualified specialist at the international level with a respectable income.
On the other hand, one universal language could potentially lead to the extinction of other languages during the implementation of a new language. The mother language reflects the entire history of a nation, and it symbolizes the independence of a country. Because language is shaped by the history of a country, it is precious to every human. Moreover, it has been observed that learning a new language can be challenging for learners and requires significant time to become fluent.
In conclusion, implementing a universal language has been beneficial for supporting better communication and breaking down barriers between speakers. I believe that by maintaining both their native language and the universal language, people can mitigate the drawbacks.