Several opinions believe to internet will replace newspapers and magazines in terms of providing news to public. I partly agree with statement and try to explain it as I can.
There are various reasons why people prefer that all kind of news will be taken from internet instead of outstated newspapers. This is because innovation technology gives unbelievable opportunities, and it is much more comfortable for disperse information to both sides: user, and giver. From the user perspective, the public accept all kind of news absolutely for free, speed also as much as fast, better quality, different arguments and more confidence. On the provider level, for sharing many information, each press room minimum needs special machine and several stuffs. But when it would be diverted to internet, the companies should not take all of these. Just phone and better microphone. Finally, a focus on technology in all ways of news would lead to incredible level.
Internet opens not only good ways. The level of ditortation can be increased rapidly. This is because unfolding some channel, and sharing information is also free, and this job can be done by everyone’s hand. For example, a lot of fraudster know how to lie society, just opening channel from telegram or instagram, they can easily disperse the wrong or unnecessary information, at least 10 people believe to that. As a result, hackers implement unexpected works, such as robbing online money, or joining them illegal crowds. That’s why newspapers might be better.
In conclusion, some people say that Internet take a sharing news from newspapers and magazines. I think that people will use internet for news but they can face several expected issues.