Extreme sports have received a great deal of public concern in recent years. Although I acknowledge the inherent risks associated with these activities, I am opposed to the idea of banning them solely based on individual preferences.
To begin with, I am of the opinion that such sports pose a significant risk due to the possibility for injuries. It could be explained by the fact that a considerable number of individuals who engage in extreme sports get injuries of different severity, spanning from minor to fatal. Take skiing as a telling example. When an individual engages in skiing on snow-covered mountain ridges, there is a higher probability of sustaining injuries. Consequently, he probably becomes a burden for his family.
I hold a firm belief, however, that these activities should not be prohibited. The primary reason for that is people have a right to pursuit their own hobby. In several European countries, those interested in skydiving often undergo an extensive training programme lasting around six months before they are eligible to engage in their first jump. It results in individuals being able to mitigate the risk of injuries while engaging in the extreme activity. Without having a comprehensive grasp of the sports, these individuals will be precluded from partaking. ‘
Advocates often supports the notion of banning these sports because of the safety. Nonetheless, it is untrue. Recent research conducted in the United States has shown that incidents of extreme sports accidents are rare. The reason is attributed to their selection of renowned locations in lieu of some unknown places. By implementing and enforcing visible safety measures, governments may effectively reduce the occurrence of unforeseen events.
In conclusion, despite the inherent risks associated with extreme sports, I maintain the viewpoint that prohibiting them is unwarranted due to the autonomy of those engaging in such activities. It is imperative therefore to consider the potential risks prior to taking part in these sports.