In spite of the importance of art in improving life skills and creativity, the overspending of public funds could be a critical problem. Some people believe that a lot of money is being wasted on art, and I partly agree with this point of view.
Firstly, the government should pay more attention to other necessary sectors, such as education and healthcare; for instance, reducing tuition fees, making education affordable for a wider range of people and spreading knowledge, as well as supporting research labs with financial funding and encouraging scientists to invent cutting-edge technologies. In addition to education, the healthcare sector should be totally free for chronic diseases like cancers, tumours, and heart problems, to drop death rates and provide clean, high-standard care. Moreover, fields such as technology lay a significant foundation for the future development of countries; without prioritising technology, countries will struggle to compete in the global market.
In contrast, art has a high impact on enhancing tourism, which increases income and contributes to the economy. Furthermore, it can be a source of inspiration for some industries; for example, fashion, as we can see in some exhibitions, many designer pieces are inspired by paintings drawn by international artists. In addition to architecture, which many people assume is a type of art due to its aesthetic and creativity.
To conclude, the imbalance in the use of resources can be a real issue. Regardless of the essential value of art, governments must be careful with public funds and ensure that money is well distributed.