Considerable impacts on the environment made by human activities have been a heated debate. Opinions are divided on whether tackling those environmental issues is impossible in the recent times, or whether changes can be made to reverse the current situation. While I understand why some people support the former view, I am still in the favour of the latter that the combination of public awareness and global cooperation can significantly reduce our negative impact on the environment.
Those who advocate the lateness in improving environmental problems may have several arguments. From their point of view, the delayed action on environmental issues can lead to the extinction of animals. The reason here is that the procrastination in solving surroundings problems often results in continued habitat destruction, which is a primary driver of species extinction. As natural habitats are destroyed for agriculture, urban development, and other human activities, many species lose their homes and food sources, leading to population declines and eventual extinction. Consequently, the ultimate adverse consequence is the imbalance in our ecosystem, which creates obstruction in the food chain. Another point is that the loss of animals combined with excessive deforestation has contributed to the alarming situation of global warming. Forests play a crucial role in the carbon cycle by absorbing CO2 during photosynthesis. Deforestation disrupts this balance, as the removal of trees reduces the planet’s capacity to sequester carbon. When forests are cleared or burned, the carbon stored in trees is released back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (CO2). This process contributes to the greenhouse effect, where increased CO2 levels trap heat in the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of global warming are profound and interconnected, influencing environmental stability, human health, food security, and economic resilience. Immediate action is necessary to mitigate these impacts and adapt to the changing climate.
Nevertheless, I still side with those who believe that fostering awareness among citizens and global cooperation will be effective measures in addressing the issue for several reason. Chief among these is that being educated will help citizens to be fully aware of the detrimental impacts on the environment. When people understand the impacts of their behaviors—such as carbon footprints, waste generation, and resource consumption—they are more likely to adopt sustainable practices. This grassroots engagement can lead to significant changes in consumption patterns and support for policies aimed at environmental protection. The second reason is that global cooperation will foster resilience by enabling countries to learn from each other’s experiences and strategies in dealing with environmental changes. This collective learning can enhance adaptive capacity, allowing nations to better prepare for and respond to climate impacts, such as extreme weather events and shifting ecosystems.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging why people think that delayed on environmental issues pose great risks to the environment, I still hold the belief that certain methods can be applicable in addressing the problem.