Demolishing old buildings to people is like keeping antiques in the basement.In numerous numbers of cities there is not adequate capacity and space to develop in consequences,in order to rebuild direlict buildings are destoryed and replaced with new buildings.I personally believe that it is a mixed blessing.
Some individuals might grew fund of old buildings due to many factors.Initially they show the embodiment of a culture and some suppose them to be a heritage.Old buildings may seem to be artistic and can help the beauty of a city by its foundation which dating back to many years ago.A shining example can be Italy, by being in Rome’s streets ,pavements and surrondings you will feel the past.On the other hand,by protecing these old buildings we can improve toursim industry as well ,which is beneficial financially.Scrutnizing this case, by preserving old constructions for posterity we can keep the history alive.However,this case must be considered on a broader canvas.
By looking from another prespective,industrilized cities can not accepet run-down buildings and modernzing neccessiates and matters.A telling example can be,New York as its skyline is the mixure of skyscrapers and imposing buildings.You will be amazed by latest version and updates of every equipment and facilities.For its city dewellers , modernizing is everything.Significently,old buildings can not provide comfort and convinient as much as the latest constructions can.In terms of comfort and appearnce it is a must in many areas.
On balance if as a result,demolishing old buildings to people is like keeping antiques in the basement,then we can conclude that it is diffrent based on tastes and it is a double edge sword which has both benefits and drawbacks.