Some countries practice public criminal trials, using TV. Disadvantages outweight advantages. While the nation, with awareness of punishments, might diminish criminal rates, some people have unstable mentality, which can be easily damaged.
Regarding advantages, contries that overtly demostrate penalities encourage public to fear the responsibility for the potential crimes. The cruel demostrations of criminal trial produce a remarkable influence on the audience. The viewers are becoming aware of concequences of the illegal actions. With this knowledge people, driven by fear of being punished, tend to break the law less. It is likely that public would adhere to the law, avoiding an undesired destiny as that of punished criminals.
As for disagvantages, people’s psychological health can be harmed by demostrations of that kind. Television is widespread platform, which can be approached by everyone. Youngsters as well as adults may consume these acts of violence. The harsh content will scare public. So, some individuals may experience mental issues in the future. Consuming violent content during lifetime may alter idenity. People may become evil, angry or uncontrollable. These character traits may be a foundation for criminal state of mind, which is an opposite of desired effect. For example, children are mostly vurnurable to psychological influence: their minds can be easily controlled and occupied. Watching the criminal trials, they may gain negative experience, misguided values and believes.
In conclusion, the public criminal trials in some counties affect people, which are consumers of the content. While these demonstrations lessen criminal activity, they are harmful for publicity’s mental health. So, disadvantages outweught advantages.