Nations around the world state that teenagers who just completed high school should take a year to rest before moving on to another higher education. This initiative has both pros and cons. The following essay will discuss both sides of this topic.
Continuing to study straight to university without having resting time helps under-graduates stick with their learning energy from high school. This decision makes them not let their body stop working, which makes them forget what the study environment is, allowing learners to always be ready to face challenges in the future. For example, one research of SuThoi shows that 87% of students who are not taking a gap year to be more able to adapt pop up unforeseen situations in their life. In addition, those youngsters will have more time to look for their future careers when they finish their courses.
On the other hand, give themself some time to refresh and self-exploration allows tutees to know more about their self and life’s aspects. Experience and enjoying their youth by not doing colleges straight away make learners broaden their mind about the world and their characteristics. For instance, so many teenagers found that what they really get into when they traveling in the time they take a break, not their previous decision of courses they will learn when they finish secondary college. Furthermore, tutees can also experience how the big wild world works by trying new things or having new jobs in that time.
In conclusion, while keep going on to study at university offers benefits of adaptability of study and time after university. I believe that having a gap year is more important which really helps learners to know what they actually want to do in their future careers, how the world works, and how to deal with life in reality.