In this ever-changing modern world, the problem concerning wild life is really controversial because advocates of each side hold extremely strong viewpoints. As regards wild animals, some people critically think that the 21st century is not the one for wild animals, and any attempt to protect them will lead to time and resources being wasted. However, others, such as environmentalists or green peace members, take the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, I completely support the latter way of thinking.
Firstly, as living entities like human beings, wild animals absolutely have the right to live peacefully and develop appropriately in nature. Bendes, they have been deemed to be our close friends since the dawn of humankind. For example, they have helped us efficiently in such categories as agriculture, transportation, and so on. Therefore, no one is entitled to deprive those animals of their normal lives in this century. Additionally, any actions that do harm to wild animals will be against the law and humanity and should be severely punished.
Secondly, it is common knowledge that fauna and flora have a significant mutual relationship in nature. If no place is reserved for wild animals in this century, they will undoubtedly come to extinction sooner or later. Subsequently, the current ecological balance will be broken, which culminates in the massive depression of evergreen forests—the precious beings of the Earth. As a result, we have to face many tremendous calamities, like unceasing droughts, widespread floods, or terrible tropical storms. Then, it cannot be ensured that man can keep on living on this Earth, or maybe it is no longer a green and peaceful planet in the universe.
Last but not least, the 21st century is definitely the century of science and technology, which enables us to live better and enjoy such substantial advances in science. However, these certainly exist; besides some meaningful achievements, other destructive advances serve the negative purposes of some nations. Accordingly, a huge amount of money has been wasted on biochemical weapons, raging wars, or religious conflicts. Why can they not put aside only a small amount of that to do something more meaningful, like preserving wild animals? Hence, I strongly believe that the conservation of wild animals in times of economic welfare will never be synonymous with a waste of our time and resources.
In a nutshell, I would like to emphasize that it is indispensable to protect wild animals appropriately, whenever and wherever. Moreover, feasible measures to achieve that target should be taken into greater consideration. If so, a better life. I hope there is no shadow of doubt waiting for both wild animals and human beings in the not-too distant future!