Governments valued allocating funds from their financial resources on advancement a healthy lifestyle over treatment. As far as I am concerned, both are supposed to be funded.
On the one hand, promoting a hygienic way of life should be attentive by authorities from national budget because many habits of individuals may harmful to them. Numerous bad addictions of people cause some health issues for them; therefore, to avoid the problems governments should give awareness regarding the impacts of the routine on individual’s health. For example, alcoholic drinks are getting a catastrophe among people because the drinks have the worst effects on liver, so governments authorities should promote anti-alcholic campaign to reduce expenditure of alchol and raise consciousness about its badness.
On the other hand, it is argued that money of governments’ financial resources should be spent to diagnose and cure some diseases, so many care centers and research centers should be constructed. A number of illnesses are hidden in people’s body to find out the disease, researches are required; moreover, for proper treatment of the sickness hospitals should be established. For instance, to detect kidney stones, research centers are needed to be built; in addition, to deal with the kidney disease some hospitals are required to be manufactured. So according to aforementioned reasons, both Sponsoring a healthy lifestyle and building treatment centers are needed to be concerned.
To conclude, it is said that governments should stimulate a hygienic way of life than remedy. In my opinion both should be considered.