In a temporary society, some believe universities should be funded in the areas for all students in high schools by the government, which is ineffective and impossible. I firmly agree with this perspective because of accounting for the significant government budget and the increasing unemployment rate among young people.
Granted, allocating for a university on a mass scale is often unrealistic, as constructing and renovating the university areas and hiring the academic staffs are challenging. Erecting the new facilities, ensuring enough teachers for all students are affected on the expenditure of the government, leading to lower investment in health, public services, and other parts of education. Furthermore, students have to study in the larger class size or the individualized attention threatens the quality of each class. If people have too much opportunities to enter into the universities, the value of degrees will be underestimated.
Additionally, offering a wide range of education in universities is questionable. University degrees are appropriate for the students who tend to work in the researching field, however; if individuals prefer jobs such as engineering and cooking, they should choose vocational training for them. Because they study in the smaller time and receive early certificates to earn money. Moreover, when a bachelor’s degree becomes too common, it may lead to an increase in unemployment and a noticeable shortage in manual labor industries. Finally, focusing too much on university education can lead to a lack of diverse skill sets in society, as it neglects the importance of vocational training, which is crucial for filling labor gaps in various sectors.
In conclusion, although studying in universities equip for students a plethora of opportunities working in professional companies, it is not suitable for all people in different conditions. The government should balance between both types of education in order to ensure the number of graduates can find their jobs.