It is argued that authorities usually spend more budget on wildlife services, while there are more important other societal issues. This essay totally agrees with this statement because supporting human needs is more essential and other life aspects such as health and education.
It must be acknowledged that citizens needed much more subsidization in the last decades, especially after the COVID-19 attack a few years ago. The crises during the quarantine era generated an enormous lose for jobs, employees were unable to maitain a sustainable income, in another words companies closure led to salaries cut-down, people no longer able to purchase goods to feed their families. For example, a study conducted at KFU, illustrated that 60% of employees had lost their jobs in 2020 and a rise in unemployment arrow had presented. Thus, cities must adresse the critical socital issues, rather than animal conervation.
Moreover, Another parts that is more significant than allocating expenditures on natural habitats is the health and education sectors. The fact that Coronavirus affected the health must be integral, resources must be allocated toward health benefits. Further more, the government must foster the community with a solid educational system, education is the key element for development that stimulates the economy. For instance, several low income families are not able to provide their children with proper school supplies and government subsidies should be comprehensive to them. The financial investment on the next generation will provide countries a powerful infrasturcture for better future.
In conclusion, though governments tends to spend their major share of resources to protect wildlife, this essay established convincingly that priortising public funds for helping people to gain the necessary education and financial security is much more rewarding on the long run.