There is fierce debate among individuals that, in the modern world, governments are giving more preference to wildlife instead of other projects. While some argue that local bodies spend too much money on projects to save wildlife,. In my opinion, I strongly agree that administrative bodies should spend more money on other projects, such as monuments, schools, and hospitals, than on wildlife. This essay intends to discuss my views in the upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, critics of the government argue that the government overspends the money on wildlife. Many countries are facing deficits because of wildlife. To cite an example, according to a survey conducted by the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) in 2005, it found that 40% of state capital is allocated to wildlife. Authorities are utilizing hectares of land, providing shelters to wild animals. Therefore, it affects the lives of common people. On the other hand , in rural areas, people are living on roadsides because local bodies utilized their properties for wildlife protection from endangered species.
However, another striking reason is that the administration should also think about investing in other projects, such as building monuments, schools, parks, and hospitals, and improving infrastructure facilities in rural and urban areas, because it helps to boost tourism in the countries and also generates per capita income for the country. Furthermore, the government should take a keen interest in investing money in infrastructure projects rather than spending money on protecting wildlife.
To recapitulate, I opine that the government should not invest too much money in wildlife; instead, it should spend money on other projects. This helps the common people to live comfortable and happy lives in society