In an era characterized by rapid advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, it has become increasingly common for major internet corporations and agencies to store the personal data of many individuals. While this practice brings certain benefits associated with improved personalized services, I believe it does more harm than good in terms of privacy invasion.
Proponents of collecting personal information cite various reasons to support their stance. One of them would be enhanced personalized services. When large internet companies, such as Google, Facebook, and Amazon, acquire personal information, they can provide their customers with superior services, as they can understand their preferences and desires through these private details. This can ultimately increase people’s satisfaction and loyalty, but also motivate these large internet corporations to increase corporate involvement in such matters, thereby fostering personalized services. In a world where the demand for personalized services has surged across the population, upgrading such services takes on added significance.
Nonetheless, in my view, the disadvantages of holding personal information are significant. The primary downside of this practice is that it can negatively affect privacy. This is because if these tech giants obtain the personal information of individuals, they are likely to expose their databases, as hackers and cybercriminals attack these services. As a result, this can allow such wrongdoers to use this personal data for their malicious purposes, such as withdrawing money illegally from a card or engaging in fake sales or transactions. This is especially problematic for people suffering from debilitating feelings, including anxiety and stress, as losing their privacy can make a big difference in terms of perpetuating these conditions even further.
In conclusion, although the collection of personal information of users by large internet corporations yields clear benefits regarding strengthened personalized services, I believe the disadvantages of such practice outweigh its advantages, as it compromises privacy.