Crime is a serious issue in many societies, with different opinions on how to reduce it effectively. While some people propose that the best solution to this problem is extending prison sentences, many believe that alternate methods should be considered. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and explain why I support the latter approach.
On one hand, supporters of extended imprisonment believe that the stricter and longer punishments will discourage citizens from breaking the law. When they become aware that committing a crime may leads to many years behind bars, they will have to think twice before attempting to do anything they might soon regret. Moreover, longer prison sentences may keep society in check by removing dangerous individuals temporarily. Serious offenders such as murderers or violent criminals may need to be kept away for the safety of others.
On the other hand, many believe that focusing on the root of the problem is a better approach to criminal activity and will lead to better outcomes. Better education, higher job opportunities and mental health support can prevent an individual turning into a criminal in the first place. For instance, many criminals come from disadvantaged backgrounds, some lack both proper education and parental guidance, leading to their present situation. If the governments can invest more in social programs or offer a helping hand to families who are in desperate situations, crime rates may become lower in the long run.
In conclusion, while longer sentences and stricter punishments can be a viable option in extreme cases, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Addressing the problem from the root and prevent crimes from happening from the start should always be prioritized more.