In contemporary society, it has become increasingly common for the media industry, particularly in TV shows, to cast ordinary people instead of accomplished actors. While this practice mainly stems from financial matters and audience engagement, I believe hiring average people to act as stars may pose certain challenges in terms of a lack of acting skills and privacy invasion.
Choosing ordinary people for TV shows as stars can be attributed to a variety of factors. One of them is cost-effectiveness. When broadcasting companies hire average people, they have the opportunity to save money, as such novices can perform without specialized tools, makeup, or high-end fashion, unlike their professional counterparts, thereby helping media agencies maintain their budgets. Another reason why many TV shows involve ordinary people as stars is audience engagement. This is because viewers enjoy seeing people like themselves on screen, including sharing similar financial backgrounds, failures, ambitions, cultures, and achievements.
Nonetheless, in my view, the drawbacks of hiring an average person for TV shows are substantial. The primary downside of this practice is a lack of acting skills. This is because ordinary people do not have enough opportunities, skills, and talents as professional ones. As a result, this can not only compromise ordinary actors’ well-being but also negatively affect the media’s reputation. Furthermore, casting ordinary people for TV shows as stars presents a privacy invasion, since non-professionals may not be ready for public scrutiny, discrimination, and negative feedback.
In conclusion, although selecting an average person for TV shows as stars is primarily driven by financial reasons and audience engagement, I believe this practice presents clear disadvantages regarding a lack of acting skills and privacy invasion.