Advancements in technology have fostered news updates through social media. On the contrary, the latest news is rapidly uploaded on social sites rather than shown through news channels. The news channels provide detailed news by analyzing the practical facts on the spot where the incident was held. Some of the hidden insights are not highlighted by the online news platforms, but news stations do. The essay deals with the rapid spread of social networking news compared to news channels, and the future will depend on social sites instead of news channels. I agree with this statement by promoting it more towards the news channels.
On the one hand, social networks have been boosted a lot since the past few years. They have contributed to many aspects of news including, for example, sports, cinema, politics, and international affairs, such as the Ukraine and Russia wars. However, they were unable to provide insights into many major news stories, for instance, the share market crash due to international affairs. Moreover, they are also unable to provide major reasons and theoretical analysis.
On the other hand, even though news channels are not as hasty as online platforms, they also provide insights into issues by analyzing the situation, studying it theoretically, and providing factual data, which is unable to be provided by online platforms. For instance, Aaj Tak, a news channel in India, provides factual data about news such as a flood in Tamil Nadu.
In conclusion, though social sites provide data quickly, they are also unable to provide actual facts about incidents. While news channels provide insights into incidents with specific proof and facts about the news. Therefore, I disagree with the essay’s statement.
