It is a conventional belief that prison is the only way to keep law-breakers in captivity. While others believe that providing academic education is a more efficient procedure, I would argue that both of them play an integral role in addressing the problem.
On the one hand, there are many compelling reasons justifying that imprisonment is a good way to deal with offenders as a whole. Firstly, the more rigorous the government’s prisons are, the more secure the citizens are. For example, in “ADX Florence” prison, which was strategically located on a small island 2 kilometers offshore, with intensive security, criminals have no escapable chance. If there are no strict obligations to those people, there would be a proliferation of murder accidents. Secondly, as regards the serious law-breakers, this is the most accessible way to conduct. Murderers, for instance, must be imprisoned for many years and such a punishment may act as a deterrent. They must have a sense of awareness that they will face loss of freedom, social isolation and separation from their loved ones if they conduct such a criminal act.
On the other hand, I would speculate that education has a complementary role to play. First and foremost, it is the most consistent way to deter law- offenders. For instance, there are innumerable ex-prisoners cases annually in Vietnam; while murderers, who commit tragic crimes, are wandering outside with their impenitence. This leads to an imperative culminating number of accidents over the world such as Ecuador and Thailand. Eventually, educating is the only procedure to tackle it. Furthermore, only when those individuals are instructed by fundamental ethic courses, the problem is solved.
In conclusion, it is apparent that both education and imprisonment are significant to deter criminals. Meanwhile, we have to take measures into effect to solve it altogether.