These days, many claim that people prioritize the protection of wildlife too much, squandering a substantial amount of money. Personally, I feel that this point of view is completely wrong since people still unaware of dire consequences of their actions related to harming wild animals and birds.
The initial motive why I disagree with the statement lays behind the fact that the majority continues to kill and hunt wildlife. If they had been familiarised with outcomes of their actions, they would not have been kill and hunt wild animals and birds. In fact, one of the major hobbies in Uzbekistan is considered to be hunting, meaning that people are not covered with a blanket ban on harming biodiversity. It is therefore unfair to state that wild animals and birds are in the public eye.
In addition to lack of awareness, I firmly believe that the governments ought to preserve animals that are on the fence of extinction as it helps to maintain the food chain. Apparently, low-class animals tend to be eaten by bigger ones, keeping the food chain in balance. Eagles, for example, consume different unfriendly insects, thus cleaning the environment. I, consequently, assert that people should concentrate more on the protection of wildlife.
In conclusion, I think that there is no an extreme proportion of attention in terms of the wild animals and birds protection and people should keep an eye on that more, maintaining the food chain and benefiting the nature.