In an era where individuals are constantly exposed to various negative reports on TV and in newspapers, some argue that this trend has disadvantages and thus should not be allowed in the media. Although arguments favoring this might seem more compelling at first glance, a closer examination reveals that this is not the right choice.
Advocates of anti-bad news claim that reporting negative current affairs might cause serious detrimental effects. This perspective suggests that rather than devoting time to the broadcast of plane crashes, calamities, or murder stories, mainstream and alternative media should focus on positive news. They claim that this aligns with the principles of maintaining a harmonious society. However, this view is inherently flawed as it overlooks two critical aspects: the pressing need for awareness of social issues and providing people with relevant news coverage to make informed choices.
Conversely, I agree with those who contend that media focusing on issues have several merits. From a social security standpoint, informing people about the possible dangers they might encounter in society might actually help to reduce undesirable instances. Reporting crime stories, for example, might urge citizens to take proper actions to protect themselves or encourage the government to take necessary protective measures. Although some might say that this trend might create a false image about the country, I believe that it is better to be informed rather than having a false confidence about the welfare and peace in society.
To sum up, although the former view is not completely fragile, I believe that it does not stand on solid proofs. Therefore, I cannot help but believe that the media should continue to draw public attention to problems rather than ente
rtain.