In this modern era, technological inventions are skyrocketing day by day. It is argued that experimental advancements to be done by higher authorities instead of local companies. I whole heartelly accord with this statement and the viewpoints are discussed in further paragraphs.
To begin with fund can be the most effectiveness issue for this statement clearly, the higher government authorities have the most support from the state economy the funds can be issued by Ministry of finances and they can hire best scientist and purchase better stuff for their inventions. The success rate of their invention is much higher than commercial industries for example, a survey was conducted by Dr. Richard Brown from Oxford University of London and he stated NASA a scientific search company authorized by government in USA is the best among other nations due to its budget and the scientist working in it. hence money can make such inventions very secure and reliable.
Secondly, every inventions are not perfect, and the consequences are faced by the local people in the form of environmental issues, blast or any other miss happenings if the project is done by the government, and by chance any problem ocuurs , the government will be totally responsible for that and can provide the evidence to the public for the misconduct of the experiment as the commercial organization cannot handle the situation. For instance implementation of artificial earthquakes led to a volcanic eruption on one island of Australia in 1989 and they totally distract the wildlife at that time, the scientific research company has to pay the huge for this loss. resultantly the government can handle the situation with responsibilities
To conclude it, government research companies are far better than local companies as the inventions are excellent and have good quality. Moreover, they can be responsible for the misconduct of the project.
