In evolving world, most developed countries are investing money in the arts or important services. People have different views as to whether governments should invest more in the arts, while other people should prioritize funding for more essential services. I believe that prioritizing funding is more essential for positive impact on people.
One argument in favor of investing more in the art, that is to say, art enhances creativity and improves collaboration and cooperation. For example, art helps people to suggest they might bring positive impact and good lifestyles. And art often requires teamwork, but art brings different problems, such as diabetes, sedentary lifestyle, and eye problems. As a result, some people are surviving from a disease.
However, the opposite argument is that prioritizing funding for more important services. In other words, essential services are playing significant provincial roles. Their argument that without adequate healthcare, education, and public safety. They might reduce crime rates. As a result, people can live without security and peace. In my opinion, an essential service approach is necessary for life.
In conclusion, should governments invest more in the art or prioritize funding for more important services. In my opinion, governments should prioritize more essential services than that governments should invest more money in the art.