There are various speculations that senior citizens are considered superior in contrast to the juveniles. From my perspective, adolescent citizens as a leader are commendable due to various facts like adaptability, energy and technological competence.
The most captivating reason is that, elderly people possess extensive life experience that makes them more appealing. Initially, older leaders tend to possess a cultivated network of contacts that can facilitate negotiations and collaborations, potentially leading to more successful outcomes. Initially, senior citizens are more loyal with their sovereignty and tend to demonstrate patience that are essential for team management. To illustrate, in general head surgeons are more capable of operating efficiently with time management instead of the freshers.
Conversely, I strongly advocate the opinion of hiring youth as professionals as they bring plethora of advantages. Although, as the standard of living has dominantly shifted towards the artificial intelligence which has swapped the manual programming with automation. Moreover, youngsters are highly pundit in usage of using modern tools like adobe photo-shop and python programming.Furthermore, younger individuals typically exhibit a higher level of energy and enthusiasm, which can invigorate a team and cultivate a positive workplace culture. As a result, it will nurture the economy globally. For instance, Zohan Mamdani a popular member of democratic party is recognised as a youngest influential politician in United States.
In conclusion, while the experience and wisdom of older leaders undoubtedly offer significant values I adhere to the fact that juveniles should get the leading spot. It will enhance the social cohesion and behavioural patterns yet keeping a balance among work and life. So, it is recommended that government should retire the aged professionals and give a chance to the younger ones.