There is always an argument about restrictions on drinking at early ages. Some people believe that it is better to have legal age gap policy on consuming alcohol , while others think that there is no harm to make drinking legal without any prohibitions on age. In my opinion ,the first statement has more benefits than latter one. This essay will discuss both views and provide my opinion.
On one hand , providing strict laws on drinking beneficial in terms of making healthy society. The whole world aware of alcohol’s negative effect on humans body and health. It is one of the most harmful products which people can consume. Starting to drink in young age can cause not only addiction , it is also can lead to significant consequences such as cancer appearance. These restrictions ensure protection for young generation from early addiction on drinking. Moreover these law protect teenagers health and their life.
On the other hand, by canceling laws related to drinking can make other opportunities such as giving people freedom in their choice , and enhance sense of responsibility for their own life. Human will have chance to decide making right decision. They will start to be responsible for their own health and life. However, teens are societies the most unprotected part. It is always easy to influence on them. They cannot deal with their curiosity or social influence and this will lead to harmful endings such as alcohol addiction and health problems.
In my opinion, strict laws on alcohol especially on age gaps are playing crucial role in our societies wellbeing. Because these prohibitions protect our future adult generations’ health and life. Wellbeing of our young generation is insurance of bright future.
In conclusion, despite of some advantages of canceling laws related to consuming alcohol, I strongly believe that it is better to make these restrictions. Because they protect youngsters and ensure our healthy life.