There are many societies suggest that governments should fund more money to maintain the historical landmarks, whereas others prefer to spent that money on the future building. This essay will discuss both views before presenting my own opinion.
First and foremost, several people believe that maintaining historical palces is going to make a significant improvement in tourism, due to the plenty of economic benefits from the country’s history, which is represented in landmarks and museums. A good example of this can be seen in japan, the most common place to visit is the mountain of fuji because its beauty, but also owing to the funding that putting on preserving it from any kind of disasters . According to some studies, more than 60% of tourists went to japan to saw that popular mountain. This clearly shows the importance of preserving the old places in many countries.
On the other hand,despite the numerous advantages of maintaining historical places, some individuals suggest that spending money on modern building is much better. This can be explained by the fact that the modern infrastructure is more solid and providing guarunteed safety. To illustrate in 2022, a study found that there is a dramatic difference between the old and modern infrastructure because the old infrastructure was more capable to ruined than the modern. This demonstrates that building with the modern infrastructure is more safe for humans.
To sum up, the two perspectives put forward a valid points. However, i firmly believe that funding the maintain of historical landmarks is much important than other plans.