There is an opinion that some archaic erections are more worth preserving than other ones. From my perspective, there are certain kinds of them that should be conserved, and the merits of doing so outweigh the demerits for several reasons.
It is undoubted that old buildings with cultural value should be carefully preserved. This is because they provide people with insights into the past, assisting them to acquire more expertise about unique craftsmanship, designs, and historical events they represent. Such understanding can foster posterity’s national pride and cultural identity, which is alarmingly threatened in the current context of globalization. Moreover, it is of equal importance to conserve religious ancient buildings, as they are living proofs to the development of different religions and considered as a haven for the followers. As a result, improved mental well-being of people can consequently motivate them to work harder, contributing massively to the national economy
Some opponents may argue that it can cost insurmountable amounts of money to protect these buildings, as different existence periods of buildings make it crucial to adapt various protection steps. However, this line of reasoning is not necessarily true in some senses, considering the fact that old buildings are recently reported to be potential contributors to tourism. This can be observed in the increasing number of visitors traveling to appreciate quintessential constructions of the past, providing many economic opportunities and potential developments to the locals that can exceed the initial costs of protection measures.
On balance, old buildings worth protecting are those with cultural and religious values, and given all the aforementioned beneficial features, the positives of such conservation doubtlessly outweigh the negatives.