The issue of raising children in the city, but some believe children should be developed in the countryside, has sparked considerable debate. While some people argue that the countryside is better for youth development, others believe that the city is superior for children. In this essay, both views will be discussed before I express my opinion on the matter.
On one hand, it is said that children should be raised in the city. This is because many people say that in the city there are many facilities for babies to be better taken care of. Consequently, in the city, there are many schools for good schooling, games for a healthier life, meeting rooms, and lobbies.
On the other hand, other people think that the countryside should be a better place for young generation development. Many believe this because in the countryside there is natural food, natural healthcare, and water. A case in point is that there is everything natural that is good for children to develop. Thus, this point holds a reasonable answer.
In my opinion, urban areas are more superior to youth growth, while I understand the reasoning behind other people’s points of view. Who says the countryside is more good? I believe that there are more benefits in cities. Therefore, the city is a better place for growth.
In conclusion, both sides of the debate present valid arguments, as some believe it is great for children’s development, while others argue that farmland is superior to growth. However, I am convinced that cities are more successful for growth because of all the facilities that are available in urban areas.