Around the globe, traffic problems have become increasingly prevalent. Although some argue that improving public transportation should be the priority, others assert that it is more beneficial to focus on the infrastructure of the roads. In my opinion, fixing the puplic transit system is more effective as it has been proven more applicable.
The primary reason some people advocate for improving infrastructure to solve traffic issues is that it can significantly reduce travel time. With more facilites, such as gas stations and bus stops, both individuals and goods would move faster between destinations. This would encourage many investors and bussiness owners to expand in a certain country, as it should be much easier to transport products and workers. Therefore, improving the quality of roads and the assisting facilities is recommended by many to help solve the ongoing problem of traffic, and thus resulting in better economic opportunities.
Focusing on public transportation, on the other hand, is viewed by many as the more achievable method to alleviate the traffic congestion. In a world where space has become a rare commodity, more goverments prefer attracting more individuals to the public option by developing a reliable system, rather than creating new links or facilities. This approach has led to many positive outcomes in numerous major cities around the world. For example, the public transit in Tokyo is renowned for its strict schedules and comfort features, which is why the vast majority of the population use it as their main way to navigate the city, leaving streets with less private vehicles. Hence, improving shared transportation is believed by many to be the more reliable sollution.
In conclusion, despite the undeniable benefits of pirioritizing road infrastructures, I firmly believe that adopting the strategy of improving public transportaion is far more effective.