Some citizens believe that each individual should carry a firearm in order to defend themselves, and this should be legalized due to rise of assault rate in the countries (especially in Europe). To a great extent i disagree, firstly, fire weapon legalization might provide increase of the terrorist attacks and deliquency; secondly, psychological test would not always be comletely accurate and it will end up with unpredictable deaths.
No one can totaly be consider that some individuals would use purchased gun as a protection, there might be another intention. Some humans can use it as a offensive tool in order to commit a crime. As a vivid example of given situation is few states in the USA where anyone can purchase a weapon in regular stores legaly, and obviously it have increased the rate of murders by shooting and roberies with a gun threat. Consequently, it might lead to a chaos and anarchy on the peaceful streets.
Moreover, psychological test that is neccessary in order to recieve a license for a firearm will not always be rightful. In other words, if mentally insane human would carry a deadly weapon, he or she would be hazardous for a society. There is a bunch of situations when an individual bought a firearm with the confirm from the psychologist, then they commited a violent act of tirrorism. As a result a high amount of human’s lives loss and extremely shocked society.
In conclusion, legal permission for carrying a gun is the most dangerous decission for people’s lives. It might provide protection and confident for someone, hovewer it would bring more hazardous accidents.