People hold different views about having a poor situation like not having satisfaction with your work or short quality of money is better than to try to update this state. In my opinion, both perspectives have merit, but I personally lean towards renovating these cases.
On the one hand, supporters of having a bad life argue that it is better not to solve these cases. Sometimes, accepting some difficult cases is better to maintain your mental health, because not all problems have solutions. For example, when a man has some problem at work he will feel stress and depression, but if he will acknowledge situations and take a concentration on what he can do this helps him to learn other experiences and protect mental health. Therefore, he would change life in a better way such as, changing a workplace and thinking about future life.
On the other hand, advocates of development argue that it is better to change and solve these problems. If a human is not satisfied with his job or financial matters, active actions will bring positive aspects for him. As an illustration, searching for a new job, learning new skills or creating your own business can help in improving a quality of life and also people who do not worry about changing those lives, mostly they accept success and feel more satisfied.
However, I would argue that finding a solution for these cases is more convincing because passive choice always brings losing motivation and losing meaning of life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people should try to change their difficult cases rather than just accept them. Thus, it is clear that thinking actions help individuals improve their lives, gain new opportunities, and achieve long-term satisfaction.